Design economic policy measures that are more resistant to fraud
The Australian Government is regularly tasked with formulating and implementing economic policy measures, often in the face of severe economic adversity. These include stimulus and recovery measures, like those implemented as part of the government’s response to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis or the economic impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. They also include programs and policies implemented in the face of cost-of-living pressures caused by geopolitical tensions, conflict and extreme weather that impact supply chains and put upward pressure on the cost of goods.
A combination of financial pressure, opportunity and rationalisation is conducive to fraud. Economic downturns and uncertainty, and cost of living stress can intensify these ingredients, which can cause individuals to be less compliant with rules and obligations or decide to do something fraudulent.
Our Economic Stimulus and Recovery Counter Fraud Toolkit provides practical advice on how to identify common fraud threats and controls to safeguard new policies and spending measures against fraud. Our Cost of Living Measures Counter Fraud Toolkit provides practical advice on the fraud threats and controls that are particularly applicable to cost-of-living support and mitigation programs.
Principles to follow when designing economic recovery measures
Australian Government entities should apply the following principles when designing and implementing economic recovery measures:
- There is always going to be fraud as there is always going to be individuals who act dishonestly, especially when motivated by money.
- If you don’t find fraud you can’t fight it. The identification of fraud and corruption should be viewed as a positive and proactive achievement.
- Addressing fraud and corruption needs a holistic response incorporating detection, prevention and redress, underpinned by a strong understanding of risk. It also requires cooperation between Australian Government entities and other organisations under a spirit of collaboration.
- Fraud is ever changing as fraud schemes evolve quickly and that means we also have to evolve quickly.
- Prevention is the most effective way to address fraud as it reduces loss and reputational damage but also requires fewer resources.
Important steps when designing and rapidly delivering relief and recovery measures
Identify and assess fraud and corruption risks
Understand what the risks are. When officials have a clear and specific understanding of fraud and corruption risks, they can make better decisions about their risk tolerance or make necessary adjustments to processes, policy and program design.
Learn about conducting a fraud risk assessment.
Think like a fraudster
When people commit fraud, they take on one or more 'personas'. By exploring these personas and how they may target economic recovery measures, officials can better understand how measures might be vulnerable to fraud. They can also better counter or reduce the scale and impact of fraud.
Learn about the different types of fraudsters.
Test your controls and assumptions
Fraud control testing is a proactive and proven way of eliminating your blind spots. It helps officials find vulnerabilities and challenge assumptions about how fraud is managed within government programs. When officials know where their programs are vulnerable, they are better informed to prevent fraud or uncover where they are being exploited
Learn about testing your controls to see if they are effective.
Introduce controls
Learn about different countermeasures.