Skip to main content

Former NSW local council employee charged with defrauding 3 local councils of $1 million

Publisher
ABC
Date published
January 2026

Relevant impacts:  Government Outcomes Impact, Environmental Impact, Business Impact

A former senior employee at several New South Wales (NSW) local councils, Martin Thomas Dimec, has been charged with misappropriating almost $1.3 million in public funds by manipulating financial systems over a 12-year period. During his time across multiple councils, Mr Dimec reportedly enjoyed a high level of autonomy in financial and administrative decision making, with minimal checks on his authority. This environment allegedly allowed him to authorise payments, adjust financial records and interact with external parties without meaningful oversight.

The alleged misconduct came to light only after inconsistencies appeared in financial documents and repeated audit outcomes raised concerns. Subsequent internal investigations identified irregular patterns inconsistent with accepted governance practices, ultimately revealing what authorities allege was long running, concealed fraud. These discoveries prompted broader reviews into internal controls, risk management and the oversight of senior staff across the affected councils.

The case illustrates the significant organisational risk posed by insider threats, particularly when senior employees operate without adequate scrutiny. Despite his position of trust, Mr Dimec was allegedly able to exploit weaknesses in council systems for more than a decade. The case highlights that oversight should apply universally, regardless of tenure or seniority. Strong internal controls, routine monitoring, segregation of duties and clear accountability mechanisms remain critical to detecting and preventing misconduct.

Mr Dimec was granted strict conditional bail due to concerns he may flee the jurisdiction. The matter remains before the NSW courts.

Related countermeasures

Establish governance, accountability and oversight of processes by using delegations and requiring committees and project boards to oversee critical decisions and risk. Good governance, accountability and oversight increases transparency and reduces the opportunity for fraud.

Clearly document decision-makers using delegations, authorisations and instructions. Clearly defined decision-making powers increase transparency and reduce the opportunity for fraud and corruption.

Rotate staff and contractors in and out of roles to avoid familiarity. Staff and contractors can become too familiar with processes, customers or vendors, which can lead to insider threats.

Separate duties by allocating tasks and associated privileges for a business process to multiple staff. This is very important in areas such as payroll, finance, procurement, contract management and human resources. Systems help to enforce the strong separation of duties. This is also known as segregation of duties.

Publish information on your entity’s decision-making processes, decisions made, successful tenderers or grantees, incidents and breaches.

Report on incidents or breaches to help identify if further investigation is required. Clients, public officials or contractors can take advantage of a lack of reporting and transparency to commit fraud, act corruptly and avoid exposure.

Prepare summary reports on activities for clients, managers or responsible staff.

 Investigate fraud in line with the Australian Government Investigation Standards (AGIS).

Submit a case study

We'd like to hear from you if you have a case study to share.

Submit your case study