Skip to main content

Queensland woman accused of defrauding public hospitals through a medical device kickback scheme

Publisher
ABC
Date published
January 2026

Relevant impacts:  Human Impact, Reputational Impact, Industry Impact

A joint investigation by the Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) and the Office of the Health Ombudsman (OHO) has uncovered an alleged $2.2 million kickback scheme within the south-east Queensland public health system involving Princess Alexandra Hospital and medical device supplier Medivance. Finance manager Alana Clayton, 39, has been charged with 2 counts each of fraud and official corruption.

Investigators allege that between 2016 and 2019, Ms Clayton helped facilitate improper payments from Medivance to 2 surgeons in exchange for influencing which surgical devices were selected for use in public hospitals. One surgeon is further accused of being a part owner of Medivance, placing him in a position to profit directly from the scheme. Medivance’s director and another individual have also been implicated. Evidence gathered suggests that Medivance falsified documents to hide the arrangement, though no direct harm to patients has been identified.

The case reveals significant weaknesses in procurement oversight, conflict of interest management and supplier transparency. It highlights the need for rigorous monitoring of purchasing decisions, mandatory disclosures, enforcement of separation between clinical decisions and supplier relationships, and organisational cultures that support whistleblowers. Even in the absence of patient harm, misconduct of this nature can undermine trust in clinical impartiality and stewardship of public funds.

Charges were issued in late 2025. All accused individuals have appeared in the Brisbane Magistrates Court, received bail and await further proceedings.

Related countermeasures

Rotate staff and contractors in and out of roles to avoid familiarity. Staff and contractors can become too familiar with processes, customers or vendors, which can lead to insider threats.

Separate duties by allocating tasks and associated privileges for a business process to multiple staff. This is very important in areas such as payroll, finance, procurement, contract management and human resources. Systems help to enforce the strong separation of duties. This is also known as segregation of duties.

Develop contractual clauses to help prevent, detect and respond to fraud or non-compliance.

Conduct quality assurance activities to confirm that processes are being followed correctly and to a high standard and/or that material or goods are what they are claimed to be. Quality assurance checks not only improve processing standards, they can also detect potentially fraudulent activity and are a significant deterrent to fraud.

Internal or external audits or reviews evaluate the process, purpose and outcome of activities. Clients, public officials or contractors can take advantage of weaknesses in government programs and systems to commit fraud, act corruptly, and avoid exposure.

 Investigate fraud in line with the Australian Government Investigation Standards (AGIS).

Submit a case study

We'd like to hear from you if you have a case study to share.

Submit your case study